What are FDA's Expectations from Contract Manufacturers?
In a four-page Warning Letter to a contract manufacturer who produces semi-solid OTC products, the FDA criticized amongst others:
- Missing tests of starting and finished products
- Lacking supplier qualification
- Non-existent CAPA measures with regard to a wrong primary packaging
Besides, further critics addressed a non-existent programme for Ongoing Process Verification and lacking first validation (Process Performance Qualification).
FDA's statements on the responsibilities of a contractor are particularly interesting. For the FDA, contractors are an "extension" of the actual manufacturer. Regardless of agreements with the products' owner, the contractor is responsible for the quality of products, FDA says.
The Chinese manufacturer argued to be a cosmetics manufacturer with no intention of manufacturing any drug products. The FDA countered this argument with the definition of a drug product ... The FDA urgently recommended engaging a consultant and explicitly mentioned that the company has to comply with the CGMP anyway. According to the FDA, the executive management remains responsible for complying with CGMP and fully resolving all deficiencies.
Please also read the complete FDA Warning Letter to Hangzhou Karic Commodities Co., Ltd.
Related GMP News
04.02.2026When Training Falls Short: FDA Findings on GMP Training Deficiencies in 2025
27.01.2026New Ph. Eur. Publication Schedule
21.01.2026EU Pharma Package: EMA with single Point of Information
14.01.2026European QP Association Developments September through December 2025
14.01.2026Could a change of ownership be relevant to GMP?
07.01.2026Is QP Certification required when Products do not enter EU Territory?


