What are FDA's Expectations from Contract Manufacturers?
In a four-page Warning Letter to a contract manufacturer who produces semi-solid OTC products, the FDA criticized amongst others:
- Missing tests of starting and finished products
- Lacking supplier qualification
- Non-existent CAPA measures with regard to a wrong primary packaging
Besides, further critics addressed a non-existent programme for Ongoing Process Verification and lacking first validation (Process Performance Qualification).
FDA's statements on the responsibilities of a contractor are particularly interesting. For the FDA, contractors are an "extension" of the actual manufacturer. Regardless of agreements with the products' owner, the contractor is responsible for the quality of products, FDA says.
The Chinese manufacturer argued to be a cosmetics manufacturer with no intention of manufacturing any drug products. The FDA countered this argument with the definition of a drug product ... The FDA urgently recommended engaging a consultant and explicitly mentioned that the company has to comply with the CGMP anyway. According to the FDA, the executive management remains responsible for complying with CGMP and fully resolving all deficiencies.
Please also read the complete FDA Warning Letter to Hangzhou Karic Commodities Co., Ltd.
Related GMP News
29.07.2026EU-GMP for Veterinary Medicinal Products: What will change in Switzerland?
15.07.2026Root Cause Analysis and CAPA: Two more Warning Letters issued to Companies in Europe
01.07.2026EMA publishes updated Q&A on EU-US MRA - Veterinary Medicinal Products now fully covered
24.06.2026Reduced Testing a Matter of GMP or Specification?
17.06.2026FDA adopts updated ICH Q8/Q9/Q10 Questions & Answers (R5)
10.06.2026European QP Association Developments January through April 2026



