FDA clarifies "Intended Use"
The U.S. FDA revised the text of their "intended use regulation" to provide additional examples and explanations.
In particular clarity is provided by describing examples of types of evidence the agency would consider relevant to determining the intended use of a product.
Examples of types of evidence
Types of evidence relevant to establishing the intended use are:
- Labeling claims and representations, advertising matter, and oral or written statements by persons responsible for the labeling, or their representatives,
- Claims or statements made by or on behalf of a firm that implicitly represent a product for a particular use (implied claims),
- The characteristics of the product and its design,
- Circumstances surrounding the distribution of the product and the context in which it is sold.
According to the agency, a firm will not be regarded as intending an unapproved use of an approved product based solely on that firm's knowledge that the product is being prescribed or used by health care providers for such use (e.g. social media messages that are not commented or otherwise endorsed by the firm´s account).
The Agency says that any final rule based on this proposed rule will become effective in the next 30 days.
For more information please see FDA´s Regulations Regarding “Intended Uses”.
Related GMP News
17.09.2025When Training Falls Short: FDA Findings on GMP Training Deficiencies in 2025
17.09.2025Dealing with Systems without Audit Trail Functionality
17.09.2025Why is RCA (Root Cause Analysis) so important?
10.09.2025The Use of Hoses in Pharmaceutical Production
10.09.2025Revision of EU-GMP Chapter 1 planned with Consultation Phase
10.09.2025Audit Trail Review by the QP / Dealing with a Lack of Justification