RSS Newsfeed  Your shopping cart.
home
SEARCH

Search in

Keyword

GMP News
12 October 2006
 

New OOS Guidance by FDA!

 
Eight years after the Draft OOS Guideline, the long-awaited FDA Guidance for Industry "Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS) Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production" was published on 12 October 2006.

Compared to the draft version, now the steps of an OOS investigation are described more clearly. Phase I deals with the laboratory investigation. In this context, the guidance still distinguishes between the responsibility of the analyst and the responsibility of the laboratory supervisor.

When clear evidence of laboratory error exists, laboratory testing should be invalidated and the retest result would substitute for the original result. All original data should be retained, however, and an explanation recorded.

In case the investigation does not reveal a laboratory error, a full-scale OOS investigation has to be carried out.

Here, the guidance makes among others the following statements on retests:

  1. "It is often important for the predefined retesting plan to include retests performed by an analyst other that the one who performed the original test. A second analyst performing a retest should be at least as experienced and qualified in the method as the original analyst."

Obviously, the FDA has taken into account industry comments saying that retests cannot always be performed by a second analyst, even if the second analyst is still considered very important.

  1. "The maximum number of retests to be performed on a sample should be specified in advance in a written standard operating procedure (SOP). The number may vary depending upon the variability of the particular test method employed, but should be based on scientifically sound principles. The number of retests should not be adjusted depending on the results obtained."

It is to be welcomed that the document does not require a fixed number of retests. However, an example given at the end of the guidance shows how, in the case of an inexplicable OOS result, seven retests help to prove that the first result did not reflect the true quality of the batch. This passage clearly refers back to the footnote of the Barr case of 1993!

Further important issues of the guidance are "averaging" and "outlier tests". Unfortunately, the final FDA guidance does not include a glossary of terms, nor does it illustrate the OOS investigation procedure by means of a flowchart.
  

Author:
Dr Gnter Brendelberger
On behalf of ECA


Update:
Please find the latest GMP News and Guidelines on this topic here.

+++Update:

The information in this article may be outdated. In order to find updated information on this subject (e.g. new developments, training courses) please enter a keyword into the search engine at the top of this page.

You may also use our GMP Guideline Database to search for the current Guidelines.

If you want to receive the latest information about major GMP developments on a regular basis you may want to register for our free GMP Newsletter.
 

 

 GMP Conferences by Topics
 Quality Assurance
 GMP in Biotechnology
 Microbiology
 Regulatory Affairs
 GMP in Pharmaceutical Development
 Quality Control
 Storage, Distribution, Transportation
 Sterile / Aseptic Manufacturing
 Computer Validation
 Technical Operations
 GMP for APIs and Excipients
 Validation
 Medical Devices